نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدفِ تعیین رابطه خود ارزشیابی های محوری و انگیزه های رفتار شهروندی سازمانی با رفتار شهروندی سازمانی مدیران مدارس سه مقطع شهر بهبهان به مرحله اجرا در آمد. به همین منظور از بین کلیه مدیران مدارس سه مقطع تحصیلی شهر بهبهان، تعداد 113 نفر با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. برای جمع آوری داده ها از پرسش نامه خودارزشیابی های مرکزی، انگیزه های رفتار شهروندی سازمانی و پرسش نامه رفتار شهروندی سازمانی استفاده گردید. روش تحقیق همبستگی است. تحلیل داده ها به کمک ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون چندگانه صورت گرفت. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که بین خودارزشیابی های محوری( عزت نفس، خودکارآمدی، جایگاه مهار و عصبیت) با رفتار شهروندی سازمانی رابطه مثبت و معنادار و از بین متغیرهای یاد شده عزت نفس و عصبیت بیشترین نقش در تبیین رفتار شهروندی سازمانی مدیران داشت. همچنین انگیزه های رفتار شهروندی سازمانی ( انگیزه علاقه به سازمان، انگیزه ارزش های اجتماع و انگیزه مدیریت برداشت) با رفتار شهروندی سازمانی روابط مثبت و معنادارداشته و از بین متغیرهای یاد شده انگیزه علاقه به سازمان و انگیزه مدیریت برداشت بیشترین نقش را در تبیین رفتار شهروندی سازمانی مدیران ایفا نموده اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The relationship between core self-assessment and organizational citizenship behavior motivations with organizational citizenship behavior of schools

نویسنده [English]

  • Karim Savari

Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, iran

چکیده [English]

This study aimed to determine the relationship between core self-assessment and organizational citizenship behavior motivations with organizational citizenship behavior of schools administrators was conducted in three grades of Behbehan city. Therefore, from all schools administrator of three grades in Behbehan city,113 persons were selected by using simple random sampling.To collect data, core self-assessment questionnaire, organizational citizenship behavior motivations and organizational citizenship behavior questionnaires were used. Research method is correlation. Data analysis was performed by Pearson correlation coefficient and multiple regression. The results showed that the core self-assessment (self-esteem, self-efficacy, the inhibition and nervousness station) with organizational citizenship behavior had significant and positive relationships, and from mentioned variables, self-esteem and nervousness had most role in explaining the organizational citizenship behaviors of administrators , also organizational citizenship behavior motivations ( interest in the organization motivation, community values motivation and removal management motivation ) with organizational citizenship behavior had significant and positive relationship, and from mentioned variables interest in the organization motivation and removal management motivation have played most role in explaining the organizational citizenship behaviors of administrators.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • core self-assessment
  • Organizational citizenship behaviormotivations
  • organizational citizenship
نادری، عزت اله و سیف نراقی، مریم (1385). روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی (با تأکید بر علوم تربیتی). تهران: انتشارات بدر.
نجار اصل، صدیقه (1389). رابطه بین برخی متغیرهای مهم انگیزش شغلی با رفتار مدنی سازمانی کارکنان دانشگاه‌های آزاد اسلامی منطقه شش. فصلنامه یافته‌های نو در روان‌شناسی. 5(16):85-98.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., & Li, N. (2013). The theory of purposeful work behavior: The role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 132-153.
Borman, W. C., & Penner, L. A. (2001). Citizenship performance: Its nature, antecedents, and motives. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan(Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace (45-61). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Boyar, S. L., & Mosley, D. C. (2007). The relationship between Core self-evaluations and work and family satisfaction: The mediating role of work-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71, 265-281.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa. FL.
Espejo, A. (2011). Role perceptions and motivations to perform organizational citizenship behaviors. Academia. Revista Latino American Administration, 48:126-139.
Finkelstein, MA. (2006). Dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior: Motives, motive fulfillment and role identity. Social Behavior and Personality, 34:603-616.
Finkelstein, MA, & Penner, LA. (2004). Predicting organizational citizenship behavior: Integrating the functional and role identity approaches. Social Behavior and Personality, 32:383-398.
Grant, A.M. & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). I Won’t Let You Down …… or Will I? CSE, Other-Orientation, Anticipated Guilt and Gratitude, and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 108-121.
Grant, AM, & Mayer, DM. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94:900-912.
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92.
Judge, T. A., Locke E. A., & Durham C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19,151-188.
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331.
Judge, T. A., & Hurst, C. (2008). How the rich (and happy) get richer (and happier): Relationship of core self-evaluations to trajectories in attaining work success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 849-861.
Katz, D. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9, 131-146.
Luthans, F. (2002a). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 695-706.
Luthans, F. (2002b). Positive organizational behavior. Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1): 57-72.
Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007a). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33: 321-349.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 847-855.
Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior a motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306 ـ 1314.
Rioux, S. M. (1998). Assessing personal motives for engaging in organizational citizenship behaviors: A functional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, Pa,161.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society & the adolescent self- image. Princeton, n J: Princeton University.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.
Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-232.
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2010). Counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Are they opposite forms of active behavior? Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59, 21-39.
Van Dyne, L., & Graham, J. W. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 765-802.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in ـ role behavior. Journal of management, 17, 601-ـ 617.