طراحی و ارزیابی مدل رهبری آموزشی هیبریدی بر اساس ارکان پنج‌گانه سازمان: یک مطالعه مبتنی بر رویکرد دلفی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

گروه آموزشی علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، داراب، ایران.

چکیده
هدف از پژوهش طراحی مدل رهبری آموزشی هیبریدی برمبنای ارکان پنج‌گانه سازمان است. این تحقیق ازلحاظ نتیجه بنیادی و از حیث هدف اکتشافی و ازنظر داده‌های تحقیق ترکیبی یا آمیخته است. ابتدا بر اساس ادبیات پژوهش حاصل از آموزش مجازی، دورکاری و هیبریدی و ترکیبی عوامل مؤثر بر رهبری آموزشی هیبریدی شناسایی شد، سپس بر مبنای ارکان پنج‌گانه سازمانی مینتزبرگ؛ یعنی محیط سازمان، ساختار، فناوری، اهداف و افراد سازمان (منابع انسانی) دسته‌بندی شدند و پرسشنامه دلفی طراحی شد و مبنای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها قرار گرفت. با استفاده از روش گلوله برفی بیست نفر از مدیران مدارس و خبرگان شهرستان داراب انتخاب شدند و پرسشنامه دلفی طی سه مرحله در اختیار آنان قرار داده شد. درنهایت بین اعضاء پانل دلفی اجماع صورت گرفت و مدل رهبری آموزشی هیبریدی طراحی گردید. بر اساس آزمون کندال، عوامل فناوری با ضریب 786/0 دارای بیشترین اجماع بود. پس‌ازآن به ترتیب عامل فردی کارکنان (740/0)، محیط (695/0)، فردی مدیران (686/0)، ساختاری (649/0) و درنهایت اهداف (594/0) قرار گرفتند. درنهایت؛ مدل با استفاده از نرم‌افزار اسمارت پی‌ال‌اس در بین مدیران و معاونین مدارس شهر داراب پیاده‌سازی شد تا مورد اعتبار سنجی قرار گیرد. کلیت مدل ازنظر روایی، پایایی و کیفیت مدل‌ اندازه‌گیری تأیید شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Designing and Evaluating a Hybrid Educational Leadership Model Based on the Five Pillars of the Organization: A Delphi Approach Study

نویسندگان English

Alireza Saremi
Zahrae Hoseinzadah
Department of Educational Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Darab, Iran
چکیده English

The aim of the research is to design a hybrid educational leadership model based on the five pillars of the organization. This research is fundamental (results), exploratory (purpose), and mixed-methods (research methodology) First, based on the research literature on virtual, Telecommuting, and hybrid education, the factors affecting hybrid educational leadership were identified, then they were categorized based on Mintzberg's five organizational pillars; namely, the organizational environment, structure, technology, goals, and people of the organization (human resources), and a Delphi questionnaire was designed and used as the basis for data collection. Twenty school principals and experts in Darab (Iran) were selected using the snowball method, and the Delphi questionnaire was provided to them in three stages. Finally, a consensus was reached among the Delphi panel members and a hybrid educational leadership model was designed. Based on the Kendall test, technology factors had the highest consensus with a coefficient of 0.786. After that, the individual factor of employees (0.740), environment (0.695), individual of managers (0.686), structural (0.649) and finally goals (0.594) were ranked respectively. Finally; the model was implemented using Smart-PLS software among principals and deputy principals of schools in Darab city to be validated. The overall model was confirmed in terms of validity, reliability and quality of the measurement model.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Hybrid leadership
Organizational pillars
Delphi technique
احمدی، فضل‌اله، نصیرانی، خدیجه، و اباذری، پروانه. (1390). تکنیک دلفی به‌عنوان ابزاری در تحقیق، مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی، 8(1)، 175-185.
سرلک، محمدعلی، شیرازی، اسکندر و کولیوند، پیرحسین. (۱۳۹۳). مدیریت ضربات روحی سازمانی. تهران: انتشارات میرماه.
شامی زنجانی، مهدی و اسدی، محسنه. (1392). مدیریت منابع انسانی دیجیتال، راهنمای تحول سازمان‌ها در عصر دیجیتال، تهران: آریا قلم.
عزیزی، کیوان. (1400). بررسی نقش مدل‌های یادگیری ترکیبی در ارتقای کیفیت تدریس در دانشگاه‌ها، پژوهش و نوآوری در تربیت و توسعه، 1(4)، 37-29، https://doi.org/10.61838/jsied.1.4.4
فرح‌بخش، سعید، جعفری سرابی، مهرداد، سیاه کمری، الهام، غلامی، محمد و مرادی، سمیه. (1396). تدوین صلاحیت‌های علمی-حرفه‌ای مدیران مدارس ابتدایی استان لرستان، مدیریت مدرسه، 5(1)، 127-113.
Aboelmaged, M. G., & El Subbaugh, S. M. (2012). Factors influencing perceived productivity of Egyptian teleworkers: An empirical study. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(2), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/13683041211230276
Ahmadi, F., Nasirani, K., & Abazari, P. (2011). Delphi technique as a tool in research. Journal of Education in Medical Sciences, 8(1), 175–185. [In Persian]
Amalia, A., & Saadah, N. (2020). Dampak wabah Covid-19 terhadap kegiatan belajar mengajar di Indonesia [The impact of the Covid-19 outbreak on teaching and learning activities in Indonesia]. Jurnal Psikologi, 13(2), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.35760/psi.2020.v13i2.3572
Atasay, E., Celiker, H. D., & Avci, D. E. (2023). Investigation of prospective teachers' perspectives on science and scientific knowledge during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.1218654
Avetisyan, P., Gevorgyan, N., & Tadevosyan, M. (2024). The role of managerial competencies in higher education: Navigating current transformational trends. Revista De Gestão - RGSA, 18(10), Article e09400. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n10-277
Azizi, K. (2021). Investigating the role of hybrid learning models in enhancing teaching quality in universities. Journal of Studies and Innovation in Education and Development, 1(4), 55–72. [In Persian]
Birmipour, A., & Acharesh, S. (2021). Analyzing the skills needed by school principals in the post-corona era. Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 15(2), 145–156. [In Persian]
Bouwmans, M., Runhaar, P., Wesselink, R., & Mulder, M. (2019). Towards distributed leadership in vocational education and training schools: The interplay between formal leaders and team members. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(4), 555–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217745877
Cavalieri, A., Bottacci, F., De Coster, J. C., Fernandes, A., Sabbadini, F., Reis, J., & Amorim, M. (2025). IoT socioenvironmental assessment instrument: Validation process applying Delphi method. Applied Sciences, 15(13), Article 6982. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15136982
Cobanoglu, F., & Yurek, U. (2018). School administrators' self-efficacy beliefs and leadership styles. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.555
DasGupta, P. (2011). Literature review: E-leadership. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 4(1), 1–3.
Dunai, L., Aleixos, N., Gil, F. E. A., & Soleimani, B. (2022, October). Hybrid and online learning during Covid-19: A showcase study of Universitat Politecnica de Valencia. In 2022 IEEE 9th International Conference on e-Learning in Industrial Electronics (ICELIE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICELIE55228.2022.9969450
El Rizaq, A. D. B. (2021). Education post Covid-19 pandemic: Teachers and learners’ construction. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 28*(2), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v28i2.698
Essa, E. K. (2023). The effectiveness of hybrid learning in enhancing academic mindfulness and deeper learning of university students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 9(1), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.3054
Farah Bakhsh, S., Jafari Sarabi, M., Siah Kamari, E., Gholami, M., & Moradi, S. (2016). Compilation of scientific-professional qualifications of primary school principals in Lorestan province. Journal of School Management, 5(1), 87–106. [In Persian]
Gagnon, K., Bachman, T., Beuning, B., Koppenhaver, S., Unverzagt, C., Feda, J., ... & Young, B. (2022). Doctor of physical therapy education in a hybrid learning environment: A case report. Physical Therapy, 102(8), Article pzac074. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzac074
Ghazali-Mohammed, Z., Abaci, S., & Robertson, J. (2024). 'It was building a plane as we were flying it!' Adapting teaching through a crisis: Lessons from educational leadership staff in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(6), 1292–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2316125
Gronn, P. (2011). Hybrid configurations of leadership. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 437–454). Sage Publications.
Gudoniene, D., Staneviciene, E., Huet, I., Dickel, J., Dieng, D., Degroote, J., ... & Casanova, D. (2025). Hybrid teaching and learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 17(2), Article 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020756
Habiballa, H., Nicolae, B., & Doina, D. (2021). Educational leadership and ICT implementation in Israeli Arab sector – towards a model of hybrid leadership. Review of International Comparative Management, 22(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.24818/RMCI.2021.1.74
Jusoff, K., & Khodabandelou, R. (2009). Preliminary study on the role of social presence in blended learning environment in higher education. International Education Studies, 2(4), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v2n4p79
Kazu, I. Y., & Yalçin, C. K. (2022). Investigation of the effectiveness of hybrid learning on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.14
Kennedy, H. P. (2004). Enhancing Delphi research: Methods and results. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(5), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02933.x
Kumar, G. (2025). Blended and hybrid learning: A pathway for rural higher education post-NEP 2020. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.55319
Lalima, A., & Dangwal, K. L. (2017). Blended learning: An innovative approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
Lam, P., & Woodhead, P. (2012). A critical analysis of the challenges facing e-leaders in the 21st century: A review and comparison of the information and communication technology development of a public school and a public independent school in Hong Kong. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 18(3), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v18i03/47552
Leavitt, H. J. (1965). Applied organizational change in industry: Structural, technological and humanistic approaches. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 1144–1170). Rand McNally.
Mudhol, D. A. C. (2025). New learning paradigms: A review of emerging trends and institutional adaptability. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(6), 1601–1614. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun1423
Nasa, P., Jain, R., & Juneja, D. (2021). Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World Journal of Methodology, 11(4), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116
Ningsih, N. I. W., & Yuliana, F. (2024). Blended learning and hybrid learning. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 2(5), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr575
Omidinia, S. (2009). Development of ICT strategic plan for smart school in Iran (Case study: Ministry of Education in Iran) [Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia]. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Institutional Repository.
Onyema, E. M. (2020). Impact of Corona Virus pandemic on education. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(13), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/11-13-12
Pasaribu, B., Tobing, A. L., & Sihombing, N. (2025). Analisis penerapan sistem blended learning (Studi kasus di Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan) [Analysis of blended learning system implementation (Case study at the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, HKBP Nommensen University Medan)]. GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan, 12(1), 165–177.
Richardson, J. W., McLeod, S., & Garrett Dikkers, A. (2011). How do school districts treat K–12 principals and principal candidates with online credentials? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 14(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2010.496872
Sarlak, M. A., Shirazi, I., & Kolivand, P. (2014). Organizational morale management. Mirmah Publishing House. [In Persian]
Shami Zanjani, M., & Asadi, M. (2023). Digital human resources management: A guide to the transformation of organizations in the digital age. Aria Qalam Publications. [In Persian]
Shevtsov, A. G., & Lastochkina, O. V. (2021). Contemporary conceptual discourse on blended and hybrid learning. Scientific Journal of Khortytsia National Academy (Series: Pedagogy. Social Work), 4(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.51706/2707-3076-2021-4-9
Sulaiman, H. F., Ismail, R., Mohd Yusoff, H., Anuar, N., Mohd Jamil, M. R., & Daud, F. (2020). Validation of occupational zoonotic disease questionnaire using fuzzy Delphi method. Journal of Agromedicine, 25(2), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2019.1666762
Sultana, N., Eva, T. P., Akter, S., & Shahriar, S. H. B. (2025). Exploring new realities in hybrid learning during post-COVID-19: Perspectives from private and public universities in Bangladesh. Asian Education and Development Studies, 14(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-10-2024-0209
Taghva, M. R., Fard, M. T. T., Taheri, S. M., & Omidinia, S. (2019). Success factors for smart schools emphasizing the role of information technology: A case study. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 11(4), 731–739. https://doi.org/10.21817/ijet/2019/v11i4/191104072
Wong, B. T., Li, K. C., Chan, H. T., & Cheung, S. K. (2022, July). The publication patterns and research issues of hybrid learning: A literature review. In 2022 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET) (pp. 135–138). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET55194.2022.00036