چندمنظوره‌سازی دانشگاه‌ها: تحولی نوین در آموزش عالی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دکتری مدیریت آموزش عالی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی و تحلیل مفهوم و ابعاد چندمنظوره‌سازی دانشگاه به‌عنوان یک رویکرد نوین در آموزش عالی بوده است. پژوهش ازلحاظ هدف جز تحقیقات توسعه‌ای و ازلحاظ شیوه گردآوری یافته‌ها با رویکرد کیفی و روش تحلیل مضمون اجرا شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل اساتید و متخصصین حوزه آموزش عالی، مدیریت آموزشی، روانشناسی و علوم اجتماعی شهر تهران در سال 1403 بودند. با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند معیار تعداد 20 نفر به‌عنوان نمونه پژوهش انتخاب شدند. برای گردآوری یافته‌ها از روش مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته استفاده شد و با استفاده از راهبرد کدگذاری سه مرحله‌ای در محیط نرم‌افزاری MAXQDA مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. بر اساس نتایج پژوهش در مرحله کدگذاری باز تعداد 478 مضمون پایه، 52 مضمون سازمان‌دهنده 9 مضمون فراگیر شناسایی و طبقه‌بندی شدند. بدین‌ترتیب ابعاد مدل استحصال شده این پژوهش شامل آموزش چندوجهی، پژوهش کاربردی و نوآورانه، توسعه کارآفرینی و همکاری با صنعت، پاسخگویی به نیازهای جامعه و مسائل زیست‌محیطی، فناوری و دیجیتالی شدن، بین‌المللی‌سازی و تنوع فرهنگی، اسلامی‌سازی و تربیت اصول اخلاقی، مدیریت و حکمرانی مؤثر، توسعه مهارت‌های بین‌رشته‌ای بود. توجه به این ابعاد می‌تواند دانشگاه‌ها را از نهادهای صرفاً آموزشی به سازمان‌هایی چندمنظوره و تأثیرگذار در سطح جامعه و بین‌المللی تبدیل کند. بنابراین، مدیران و سیاست‌گذاران آموزش عالی با اتخاذ این رویکرد می‌توانند به بهبود پاسخگویی دانشگاه‌ها به نیازهای روزافزون جامعه و ارتقای نقش آن‌ها در پیشبرد توسعه پایدار کمک شایانی نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Multipurpose Universities: A New Development in Higher Education

نویسنده English

Kamran Malekpour lapari
Ph.D. in Higher Education Management, Department of Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

The present study aims to examine and analyze the concept and dimensions of the multi-purpose university as an emerging approach in higher education. This research is categorized as developmental in terms of its purpose and adopts a qualitative approach using thematic analysis for data collection. The study population consisted of faculty members and experts in higher education, educational management, psychology, and social sciences in Tehran in 2024. Using a purposive sampling method, 20 participants were selected. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using a three-stage coding process in MAXQDA software. The findings identified 478 basic themes, 52 organizing themes, and 9 overarching themes during the open coding phase. The extracted model comprises the following dimensions: multidimensional education, applied and innovative research, entrepreneurial development and industry collaboration, responsiveness to societal needs and environmental concerns, technology and digital transformation, internationalization and cultural diversity, Islamicization and ethical training, effective management and governance, and interdisciplinary skill development. Integrating these dimensions can transform universities from solely educational institutions into multi-purpose entities with significant societal and global impact. Higher education policymakers and administrators can leverage this approach to enhance universities' responsiveness to evolving societal demands and strengthen their role in advancing sustainable development.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Multiversity
Internationalization
Cultural Diversity
Multidimensional Education
Management
Governance
Anderson, J. E., Moyer, J., & Chichirau, G. (2022). Public policymaking. Cengage Learning
Bagheri Moghadam, N., & ahmadi, H. (2019). Pathology of Governance in Higher Education System in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Policy4(4), 55-74. doi: 10.22059/ppolicy.2019.69717
Bassett, R. M. (2021). From university to multiversity to omniversity: HEIs as hubs for dynamic development. The Promise of Higher Education: Essays in Honour of 70 Years of IAU, 401-405. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-67245-4_59
Bhopal, K., & Pitkin, C. (2020). ‘Same old story, just a different policy’: race and policy making in higher education in the UK. Race Ethnicity and Education, 23(4), 530-547. 10.1080/13613324.2020.1718082
Cheng, M. (2018). Multiversity In Practice: 2017 Artrend International Performance Art Festival. TheatreForum, (54), 62-73. DOI:10.1504/IJIL.2017.083403
Donovan, C. (2016). From multiversity to postmodern university. In Routledge Handbook of the Sociology of Higher Education (pp. 85-93). Routledge. DOI:10.4324/9781003262497
Elwick, A., & Friedrich, P. (2022). Trust in Higher Education Policy-Making. In Trusting in Higher Education: A multifaceted discussion of trust in and for higher education in Norway and the United Kingdom (pp. 37-50). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-87037-9_3
Flores, L. D. (2023). MULTIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE OF EARTH OF MÃE PRETA: the turn of words and the pedagogy of struggle. Caderno CRH36, e023012. doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2023-0.ch010
Furco, A., & Kent, K. (2021). The Multiversity Revisited: The Quest for Institutional Identity in an Era of Rapid Change. In Re-Envisioning the Public Research University (pp. 5-18). Routledge.
Goudarzvand chegini, M. (2018). The fourth generation university labor; and action approach (case studies: Cambridge, Stanford, and Harvard universities. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education20(78), 1-16. doi: 10.22047/ijee.2018.128487.1541
Graff, H. J. (2024). From Multi-versity andMega-versity, Back to University'-The impossible Dream of Changing" Incentive Structures" and" Business Model (s)"? Journal of Educational Thought/Revue de la Pensée Educative57(1).
Grant, G., & Christian, W. (1998). The multiversity.
Hlabse, P. (2014). Saying what we mean & meaning what we say: Multi-versity and Uni-versity–What difference does it make?. In Colloquia, Revista académica de pensamiento y cultura (Vol. 1, pp. 1-16). DOI:10.31207/colloquia.v1i0.1
Kahla, K. B. (2021). University, multiversity, technoversity and metaversity Should the old institution be buried?. Multiversity, Technoversity and Metaversity Should the Old Institution Be Buried.
Kerr, C. (2001). The uses of the university (Vol. 29). Harvard University Press.
Kerr, C. (2023). The multiversity. City of intellect: The uses and abuses of the university.
Khosravi, S. (2023). Metaverse in the university and university in the metaverse: metaversity and multiversity. Journal of Iranian Cultural Research16(2), 127-160. doi: 10.22035/jicr.2023.3261.3547
Krücken, G. (2020). The European university as a multiversity. Missions of universities: Past, present, future, 163-178. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-41834-2_10
LIM, C. P. (2021, November). From university to multiversity: How technology is changing higher education. In 2nd Leadership Development Program for Higher Education Institutions in the Philippines.
Mahdi, R. (2016). Skill Training Position in the Third Generation Universities. JST, 4 (14):103-117
Marginson, S. (2017). The world-class multiversity: Global commonalities and national characteristics. Frontiers of Education in China12, 233-260. DOI:10.1007/s11516-017-0018-1
Mirzaie, Z., Soltani, A., & Motaharinezhad, H. (2023). Explaining the characteristics of the third generation university and examining their achievement in Iranian higher education: Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman case. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education24(3), 77-106. doi: 10.22034/irphe.2018.707099
Nabipour, I. (2020), The Fifth Generation University: Based on the Quintuple Helix of Carayannis and Campbell. Iran South Med J; 23 (2), 165-194.
Najibi, S. S., & Khorasani, A. (2023). Pathology of the higher education policy system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Educational Planning Studies11(22), 76-101. doi: 10.22080/eps.2023.24473.2148
Ravi, J. S. (2012). Making the multiversity: An open higher education model. Vikalpa37(3), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920120302
Sancassani, S. (2021). Dalla multiversity alla netversity. Rivista di Digital Politics1(1), 73-94. DOI: 10.53227/101173
Yadollahi Dehcheshmeh, A., Rajaipour, S., & Siadat, A. (2021). Developing a fourth generation model for Iranian universities. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities13(4), 31-57. doi: 10.22035/isih.2021.375
Zand, S., Salehi Omran, E., & Karamkhani, Z. A. (2024), comparative Study of the Fifth Generation University in Iran's Higher Education (case study: Iran and Selected Countries). JMED 19(1), 763-775 DOI: 10.18502/jmed.v19i1.15775