شناسایی عوامل مؤثر در ارزیابی هوشمند عملکرد مدیران مدارس: یک مطالعه‌ی فراترکیب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

3 استاد گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

4 استادیار گروه سنجش و اندازه‌گیری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
ارزیابی عملکرد مدیران مدارس یکی از عوامل کلیدی در روند توسعه و اصلاحات آموزشی است، عملکرد مدیریت مدارس به‌شدت متأثر از امکانات و ابزارهای هوشمند است. هدف اصلی این پژوهش، مفهوم‌سازی و شناسایی مؤلفه‌های ارزیابی هوشمند عملکرد مدیران مدارس بوده است. روش این پژوهش از حیث گردآوری داده، کیفی و از حیث نتیجه، کاربردی بوده است. برای گردآوری داده و اطلاعات در بخش کیفی از روش فراترکیب و از الگوی هفت‌مرحله‌ای سندلوسکی و باروسو (2006) استفاده شد. ‘برای شناسایی و گردآوری منابع علمی معتبر، از پایگاه‌های علمی داخلی و بین‌المللی استفاده شد. از میان منابع موردنظر با راهبرد جستجوی هدفمند، مقالات نهایی انتخاب و مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفتند. با ترکیب محتوا و ادبیات مربوط، کدها و مقوله‌ها و مفاهیم کلیدی استخراج، تحلیل و اعتبار آنها از طریق محاسبه ضریب کاپای کوهن تأیید شد. نتایج نشان داد، مهم‌ترین عوامل شناخته‌شده در ارزیابی هوشمند عملکرد مدیران مدارس شامل: ابزارها و روش‌ها، محدودیت‌ها و الزامات، مؤلفه‌های قابل‌ارزیابی توسط ابزارهای هوشمند، عوامل مؤثر درنتیجة حاصل از ارزیابی هوشمند، مراحل اجرای ارزیابی هوشمند عملکرد، مزایای ارزیابی هوشمند عملکرد و تفاوت ارزیابی هوشمند عملکرد با ارزیابی سنتی بودند. شناسایی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های ارزیابی هوشمند عملکرد مدیران مدارس می‌تواند به‌عنوان یک منبع ارزشمند در تدوین، توسعه و اجرای سیاست‌های ارزیابی و مدیریت در مدارس ایران توسط سیاست‌گذاران حوزه آموزش مورداستفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Identifying Effective Factors in Smart Performance Evaluation of School Principals: A Meta-Synthesis Study

نویسندگان English

Faranak Tavakolifar 1
Ali Khorsandi Taskoh 2
Hamid Rahimian 2
Mohammad Taghi Taghavi Fard 3
Enayatollah Zamanpour 4
1 Ph.D. student in Educational Management, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management and Planning, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Allameh Tabataba’i University,Tehran, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Assessment & Measurement, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

The evaluation of school principals’ performance plays a crucial role in improving educational quality and supporting effective school leadership. Considering rapid development of digital technologies and the increasing use of intelligent systems in educational management, we need smart approaches for performance evaluation. The present study aimed to identify and conceptualize the factors affecting the smart evaluation of school principals’ performance. As a qualitative research, we adopted the Sandelowski and Barroso’s (2006) seven‑step model of meta-synthesis. Relevant studies published between 2013 and 2024 were systematically retrieved from major scientific databases and screened through several stages of selection and quality assessment. The selected studies were analyzed using coding and thematic synthesis to identify key themes and patterns in the literature. The findings revealed several interrelated dimensions that shape smart performance evaluation systems in educational settings, including technological, ethical, operational, educational, and behavioral aspects. These dimensions collectively influence the design, implementation, and effectiveness of evaluation systems supported by intelligent technologies. The study concludes that adopting smart evaluation approaches can enhance transparency, accountability, and evidence‑based decision‑making in school management and provides a conceptual framework that may support policymakers and educational administrators in improving performance evaluation systems.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Smart performance evaluation
School principals
Educational management
Meta‑synthesis
Artificial intelligence
Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI and Ethics, 2(3), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
Alrashedi, A., & Abbod, M. (2021). The effect of using artificial intelligence on performance of appraisal system: A case study for University of Jeddah Staff in Saudi Arabia. In Intelligent Systems and Applications: Proceedings of the 2020 Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) Volume 1 (pp. 657–671). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55190-2_48
An, Z., Liang, L., & Han, J. (2022). Research on teaching evaluation enabled by big data and artificial intelligence in classroom. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Big Data Technologies (pp. 112–118). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3565287.3565301
Barik, L., Barukab, O., & Ahmed, A. (2020). Employing artificial intelligence techniques for student performance evaluation and teaching strategy enrichment: An innovative approach. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 7(11), 10–24. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2020.11.002
Božić, V. (2023). The use of digital tools and AI in education [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Education, University of Zagreb.
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
du Boulay, B. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education and ethics. In Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0351-9_43-1
Elfakki, A. O., Sghaier, S., & Alotaibi, A. A. (2023). An intelligent tool based on fuzzy logic and a 3D virtual learning environment for disabled student academic performance assessment. Applied Sciences, 13(8), Article 4865. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084865
Farid, N., Kaleem, K., & Khan, N. (2020). Exploring the role of principals in developing conducive schools environment for learning. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review, 1(2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol1-iss2-2020(79-84)
Feng, G., Fan, M., & Chen, Y. (2022). Analysis and prediction of students' academic performance based on educational data mining. IEEE Access, 10, 19558–19571. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3151608
González-Calatayud, V., Prendes-Espinosa, P., & Roig-Vila, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence for student assessment: A systematic review. Applied Sciences, 11(12), Article 5467. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11125467
Huang, L., Sun, H., Liu, D., & Pan, H. (2022). Design and application of school management evaluation model for decision-making. In 2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education (ICISCAE) (pp. 197–201). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISCAE55891.2022.9927632
Igbokwe, I. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in educational management. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 13(3), 300–306. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.13.03.2023.p13636
Lim, T., Gottipati, S., & Cheong, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence in today's education landscape: Understanding and managing ethical issues for educational assessment. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE56641.2023.10398312
Liu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2023). Design of a control mechanism for the educational management automation system under the Internet of Things environment. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 20(4), 7661–7678. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2023329
Moore, B. (2009). Improving the evaluation and feedback process for principals. Principal, 88(3), 38–41.
Morales, J. (2022). The evaluation of teacher performance in higher education. International Journal of Science and Society, 4(3), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v4i3.489
Nguyen, L. T., Kanjug, I., Lowatcharin, G., Manakul, T., Poonpon, K., Sarakorn, W., Somabut, A., Srisawasdi, N., Traiyarach, S., & Tuamsuk, K. (2022). How teachers manage their classroom in the digital learning environment–experiences from the University Smart Learning Project. Heliyon, 8(10), Article e10817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10817
Ojokoh, B., Akinsulire, V., & Isinkaye, F. O. (2019). An automated implementation of academic staff performance evaluation system based on rough sets theory. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v23i0.1681
Pei, Y., & Lu, G. (2023). Design of an intelligent educational evaluation system using deep learning. IEEE Access, 11, 29790–29799. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3260619
Rahiman, H. U., & Kodikal, R. (2024). Revolutionizing education: Artificial intelligence empowered learning in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2293431. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2293431
Riaz, H., & Ghanghas, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence in employee performance evaluation and its managerial implication. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, 4(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v4i1.789
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.
Santiago, P., Shewbridge, C., Nusche, D., & Herzog, H. (2011). Evaluation and assessment frameworks for improving school outcomes: Common policy challenges. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264114109-en
Santiago, P., Shewbridge, C., Nusche, D., & Herzog, H. (2018). Evaluation and assessment frameworks for improving school outcomes. Education and Training Policy Division, OECD. http://www.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy
Saunders, S. G. (2011). Ethical performance evaluation: An extension and illustration. European Business Review, 23(6), 561–571. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341111175390
Serhani, M. A., Bouktif, S., Al-Qirim, N., & El Kassabi, H. T. (2019). Automated system for evaluating higher education programs. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 3107–3128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09916-2
Singh, S., & Jain, P. (2024). AI in special education: Emerging trends and challenges. In Advanced intelligence systems and innovation in entrepreneurship (pp. 56–75). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1532-3_4
Tang, J., & Hai, L. (2021). Construction and exploration of an intelligent evaluation system for educational APP through artificial intelligence technology. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(12), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i12.22573
Tejaswini, V., Chiranjeevi, B., Madhavi, B., Sushmalatha, V., Eranki, K. L., & Danthamala, K. (2024). Artificial intelligence techniques for exploring the future teaching and learning with AI. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3075, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0218629
Varma, A., Dawkins, C., & Chaudhuri, K. (2023). Artificial intelligence and people management: A critical assessment through the ethical lens. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1), Article 100923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100923
Yang, T.-C. (2023). Application of artificial intelligence techniques in analysis and assessment of digital competence in university courses. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0017
Zafari, M., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., Choi, S.-M., & Esmaeily, A. (2021). A practical model for the evaluation of high school student performance based on machine learning. Applied Sciences, 11(23), Article 11534. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311534
Zhao, X. (2022). From tradition to innovation: How intelligent technology empowers educational evaluation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Frontiers of Educational Technologies (pp. 45–52). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546918.3546924