نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قزوین، ایران.

2 گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

3 گروه مدیریت منابع‌انسانی، دانشکده منابع سازمانی، دانشگاه علوم انتظامی امین، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف این تحقیق بررسی تأثیر رهبری مشترک بر رفتارهای نوآوری پیش‌دستانه با توجه به نقش تعدیل‌کننده ادراک از پیچیدگی شغلی و نقش میانجی خودکارآمدی خلاق است. پژوهش از حیث هدف کاربردی و از نوع توصیفی است. جامعه آماری همه اعضای هیئت‌علمی دانشگاه‌های آزاد اسلامی استان آذربایجان غربی به تعداد 847 نفر در سال 1401 بوده به شیوه نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای و مبتنی بر فرمول کوکران تعداد 186 نفر انتخاب شدند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه رهبری مشترک Hoch و Kozlowski (2014)، پرسشنامه خودکارآمدی خلاق Tierney و Farmer (1991)، پرسشنامه ادراک از پیچیدگی شغلی Dean و Snell(1991) و پرسشنامه رفتار نوآوری پیش‌دستانه Zhao و همکاران (2014) و برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها و آزمون فرضیه‌ها از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری مبتنی بر رویکرد حداقل مربعات جزئی (SEM-PLS) استفاده شد. یافته‌های تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که رهبری مشترک و خودکارآمدی خلاق بر رفتارهای نوآوری پیش‌دستانه تأثیر مثبت و معناداری دارند. خودکارآمدی خلاق در تأثیرگذاری رهبری مشترک بر رفتارهای نوآوری پیش‌دستانه نقش میانجی دارد. ادراک از پیچیدگی شغلی در رابطه بین رهبری مشترک و رفتارهای نوآوری پیش‌دستانه نقش تعدیل گر دارد؛ اما اثر تعدیل گری ادراک از پیچیدگی شغلی در رابطه بین خودکارآمدی خلاق و رفتارهای نوآوری پیش‌دستانه به لحاظ آماری معنادار نیست. درنتیجه رهبری مشترک نه‌تنها موجب خودکارآمدی خلاق اعضای هیئت‌علمی شده، بلکه آن‌ها را به سمت رفتارهای نوآوری پیش‌دستانه نیز سوق می‌دهد. دراین‌بین طراحی مشاغل پیچیده و پر چالش، موجب انگیزه بیشتر اعضای هیئت‌علمی شده و اثرگذاری رهبر مشترک بر رفتارهای نوآورانه را تقویت می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Shared Leadership on Proactive Innovation Behaviors with Considering Perceptions of Job Complexity and Creative Self-Efficacy

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Maroufi 1
  • Kaveh Teymournejad 2
  • Mohammad Javad Kameli 3

1 Department of Public Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.

2 Department of Public Management, Faculty of Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Department of Human Resource Management, Faculty of Organizational Resources, Amin Police University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

This research aim to investigate the influence of shared leadership on proactive innovation behaviors, with the moderating role of job complexity perception and the mediating role of creative self-efficacy. The study is applied and descriptive in terms of purpose. The statistical population included all faculty members of Islamic Azad University branches in West Azerbaijan province, total 847 individuals in the year 2022. A cluster sampling method based on the Cochran formula was used to select a sample of 186 participants. Data were collected using the Shared Leadership questionnaire by Hoch and Kozlowski (2014), Creative Self-Efficacy questionnaire by Tierney and Farmer (1991), job complexity perception questionnaire by Dean and Snell (1991), and Proactive Innovation Behavior questionnaire by Zhao et al. (2014). Structural Equation Modeling based on Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) was employed for data analysis and hypothesis testing. The findings indicate that shared leadership and creative self-efficacy have a significant positive effect on proactive innovation behaviors. Creative self-efficacy plays a mediating role in the impact of shared leadership on proactive innovation behaviors. Job complexity perception moderates the relationship between shared leadership and proactive innovation behaviors, but its moderating effect on the relationship between creative self-efficacy and proactive innovation behaviors is not statistically significant. Therefore, shared leadership not only enhances faculty members' creative self-efficacy but also propels team members towards proactive innovation behaviors. In this regard, the design of complex and challenging jobs increases faculty members' motivation and strengthens the effectiveness of shared leadership on innovation behaviors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Shared Leadership
  • Proactive Innovative Behavior
  • Perceptions of Job Complexity
  • Creative Self-Efficacy
برزگر، نادر، قورچیان، نادرقلی، و تقی پورظهیر، علی. (1400). ارائه مدلی جهت خلق ظرفیت‌های نوآوری در مدیریت دانشگاهی ایران. مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی در نظام‌های آموزشی، 14(1)، 43-70. doi: 10.52547/MPES.14.1.43
قلی پور، مریم، افراسیابی، رؤیا، قربانی، محمود، و حافظیان، مریم. (1401). طراحی مدل دانشگاه نوآور با رویکرد یادگیری سازمانی در دانشگاه‌های آزاد اسلامی خراسان شمالی. فصلنامه رهبری و مدیریت آموزشی، 16(1)، 167-190.
قنبرپور نصرتی، امیر، بای، ناصر، و اصفهانی نیا، اکرم. (1399). تبیین نقش استقلال شغلی و پیچیدگی وظایف در رفتارهای خلاقانه کارکنان ادارات ورزش و جوانان استان گلستان. نشریه مدیریت ورزشی، 12(2)، 349-368. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2019.253108.2043
کهربایی، سارا، مرتضوی، سعید، شیرازی، علی، و خوراکیان، علی‌رضا. (۱۴۰۱). رفتار پیشگامانه، مفهومی نوین در بعد رفتار سازمانی در سازمان‌ها (شناسایی پیشایندهای رفتار پیشگامانه با استفاده از روش مرور نظام‌مند). مطالعات رفتار سازمانی، ۱۰(۲)، ۱-۴۶.
موسوی، سید نجم الدین، قاسم پور، حامد، و شریعت نژاد، علی. (1401). ادراک نقش حمایتی سرپرست و همکاران در پیدایی رفتارهای پیشگامانه. مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول، 31(104)، 41-65.  doi: 10.22054/jmsd.2022.64866.4060
یزدان‌شناس، مهدی، و نیلوفر شریعتی. (1401). تبیین بروز رفتارهای پیشگامانه کارکنان بر اساس خودتفسیری، استقلال شغلی، تعهد و شخصیت پیشگام. مشاوره شغلی و سازمانی، 14(4)، 161-188. doi: 10.48308/jcoc.2022.103149
References
Akhtar, M. S., & Ali, H. (2023). Innovative Work Behavior: An association of Leadership Styles, Job Autonomy, and Employee Proactive Behavior. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(1), 190-211. doi: https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i1.128
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
Barzegar, N., Ghourchian, N., & Taghipur, A. (2021). Providing a Model for the Creation of Innovation Capacities in Iran’s University Administration. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 14(1), 43-70. [In Persian]
Bauer, T. N., Perrot, S., Liden, R. C., & Erdogan, B. (2019). Understanding the consequences of newcomer proactive behaviors: The moderating contextual role of servant leadership. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.05.001
Chang, P. C., Ma, G., & Lin, Y. Y. (2022). Inclusive Leadership and Employee Proactive Behavior: A Cross-Level Moderated Mediation Model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 1797-1808. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S363434
Choi, O. K., & Cho, E. (2019). The mechanism of trust affecting collaboration in virtual teams and the moderating roles of the culture of autonomy and task complexity. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.032
Fan, C., Tang, S., Chen, L., & Sun, T. (2022). Perceived organizational support and proactive innovation behavior: the mediating role of basic psychological needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 804363. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.804363
Fang, Y. C., Chen, J. Y., Wang, M. J., & Chen, C. Y. (2019). The impact of inclusive leadership on employees’ innovative behaviors: the mediation of psychological capital. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144791
Fu, H., Ye, B. H., & Xu, X. (2020). The cross-level effect of shared leadership on tourism employee proactive behavior and adaptive performance. Sustainability, 12(15), 6173. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156173
Ghanbarpour Nosrati, A., Bay, N., & Esfahaninia, A. (2020). The Model of Job Autonomy and Task Complexity in Creative Behaviors in Employees of Sport and Youth Offices of Golestan Province. Sport Management Journal, 12(2), 349-368. [In Persian]
Gholipour, M., Afrassiabi, R., Ghorbani, M., & Hafezian, M. (2022). Designing a Conceptual Model for an Innovative University with a Focus on the Organizational Learning Approach (A Case Study of Islamic Azad Universities of North Khorasan). Educational Leadership & administration, 16(1), 167-190. [In Persian]
Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational statistics, 28(2), 565-580.
Imam, H. (2021). Roles of shared leadership, autonomy, and knowledge sharing in construction project success. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(7), 04021067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002
Jung, K. B., Kang, S. W., & Choi, S. B. (2022). Paradoxical leadership and involvement in creative task via creative self-efficacy: a moderated mediation role of task complexity. Behavioral Sciences, 12(10), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12100377
Kahrobaei, S., mortazavi, S., shirazi, A., & khorakian, A. R. (2023). Proactive Behavior, A New Concept in Organization’s Behavior Dimension in Iran’s Organizations. Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly, 10(2), 1-46. [In Persian]
Khessina, O. M., Goncalo, J. A., & Krause, V. (2018). It’s time to sober up: The direct costs, side effects and long-term consequences of creativity and innovation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 38, 107-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.003
Lippke, S. (2020). Self-efficacy theory. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, 4722-4727. doi: 10.1002/9781119547143.ch62
Mahmood, T., & Shafaat, R. (2020). Supportive organizational culture & shared leadership nurturing innovative employee behavior and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Business Reflections, 1(1).
Mousavi, S. N., Ghasempour, H., & Shariatnejad, A. (2022). Perceptions of the Supportive Role Supervisor and Coworker in Proactive Behavior. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 31(104), 41-65. [In Persian]
Parker, S. K., & Wang, Y. (2015). Helping people to ‘make things happen’: A framework for proactivity at work. International Coaching Psychology Review, 10(1), 62-75. DOI:10.53841/bpsicpr.2015.10.1.62
Pearce, C. L., Conger, J. A., & Locke, E. A. (2007). Shared leadership theory. The leadership quarterly, 18(3), 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.009
Peterson, R. A., & Kim, Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. Journal of applied psychology, 98(1), 194. DOI: 10.1037/a0030767
Ramzan, A., Zeb, N., Mukhtar, S., Mushtaq, S., & Iqbal, I. (2023). Shared Leadership and Creativity in Teams: Moderating Role of Team Engagement. Journal of Policy Research, 9(1). DOI:10.5281/zenodo.7773516
Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. In Advances in motivation science, 8(1), 153-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001
Schwab, D. P., & Cummings, L. L. (1976). A theoretical analysis of the impact of task scope on employee performance. Academy of Management Review, 1(2), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1976.4408660
Seeram, E. (2019). An overview of correlational research. Radiologic technology, 91(2), 176-179.
Sharma, S., & Mehta, S. (2023). Psychological Safety and Creativity in Teams: A Mediated Moderation Model of Shared Leadership and Team Diversity. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 22779752231163356. https://doi.org/10.1177/22779752231163356
Sia, S. K., & Appu, A. V. (2015). Job Autonomy and Workplace Creativity: Moderating Role of Task Complexity. Global Business Review, 16, 772-784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915591435
Strauss, K., Griffin, M. A., Parker, S. K., & Mason, C. M. (2015). Building and sustaining proactive behaviors: The role of adaptivity and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9334-5
Suhandiah, S., Suhariadi, F., Yulianti, P., & Abbas, A. (2023). Autonomy and feedback on innovative work behavior: The role of resilience as a mediating factor in Indonesian Islamic banks. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2178364. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2178364
Sun, M., He, K., & Wen, T. (2023). The Impact of Shared Leadership on Team Creativity in Innovation Teams—A Chain Mediating Effect Model. Sustainability, 15(2), 1212. DOI:10.3390/su15021212
Thakkar, J. J., & Thakkar, J. J. (2020). Introduction to structural equation modelling. Structural Equation Modelling: Application for Research and Practice, 1-11. DOI:10.1201/b11190-9
Tu, Y., Lu, X., Wang, S., & Liu, Y. (2020). When and why conscientious employees are proactive: A three-wave investigation on employees' conscientiousness and organizational proactive behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 159, 109865. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109865
Wang, D., & Ma, L. (2016, October). The influence of shared leadership on employee proactive innovation behavior. In 2016 International Conference on Management Science and Innovative Education (pp. 378-381). Atlantis Press. DOI:10.2991/msie-16.2016.85
Wang, D., & Ma, L. (2017, July). How to Improve Employee Proactive Innovation Behavior. In 2017 International Conference on Sports, Arts, Education and Management Engineering (SAEME 2017) (pp. 136-139). Atlantis Press. DOI:10.2991/SAEME-17.2017.29
Wulandari, R., Djawoto, D., & Prijati, P. (2021). The influence of delegative leadership style, motivation, work environment on employee performance in self-efficiency mediation in SNVT housing provision of East Java Province. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(3), 3294-3311. DOI:10.33258/BIRCI.V4I3.2097
Xu, S., Zhang, H., Dai, Y., Ma, J., & Lyu, L. (2021). Distributed leadership and new generation employees’ proactive behavior: roles of idiosyncratic deals and meaningfulness of work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 755513. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755513
Yang, W, & Yang, S (2020). Distributed leadership, organizational support, and new generation employees' proactive-reactive innovation behavior: based on the moderate of …. J. Ind. Eng. Manag.
Yazdanshenas, M. Shariati, N. (2023). Explaining the Employees` Proactive Behaviors in the base of Self-Construal, Job Independence, Commitment and Proactive Personality, Journal of Career and Organization Consulting, 14(53), 161-188. [In Persian]
Zhang, J., Zhang, F., & Zainal, S. R. B. M. (2023). Inclusive leadership and employee innovative behavior: moderated by creative self-efficacy. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 1346-1362. DOI:10.59670/jns.v33i.790
Zhao, B., Luan, H., Li, X. J., Bi, X. Q., & Wei, J. Y. (2014). Technical personnel proactive innovation behavior: concept definition and scale development. Stud. Sci. Sci, 32, 148-157.
Zimmerman, B. J., Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2017). The role of self-efficacy and related beliefs in self-regulation of learning and performance. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (pp. 313–333). The Guilford Press.
Zulfikar, V. A., & Rahman, R. S. (2019). Effect of Delegative Leadership on Achievement Motivation and Continuous Commitment. Kontigensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 7(2), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v7i2.67