Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
Ph.D. Student in Industrial Management, Kish Campus of Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Abstract
Conflict modeling and analysis has been done from the perspective of various Fields. One of the challenges of institutions is the lack of integration of information between them. The purpose of this research is to analyze the conflicts and develop a strategy for recruiting faculty members using drama theory. The present research is considered to be of the applied purpose type. It is qualitative in terms of data type. Because its findings pass through the clarity of understanding and interpretation of the researcher after interviewing experts and reviewing documents. The nature of the research is also exploratory. The current statistical population is information technology managers of organizations and university faculty members in the field of information technology. In research, interviews with experts, review of documents that have been used to collect information. Among the strategies for recruiting academic staff electronically, the implementation of an integrated recruitment system with the management of the Heiat Aali Jazb of Recruitment is one option, the implementation of the system of the Ministry of Science and the Ministry of Health alone, and the implementation of the systems of the ministers in the mentioned ministries separately under the supervision of the Heiat Aali Jazb. and Compiling operational features and routine reports are among other options. The finding of the research is to find the best strategy approved by all the stakeholders to implement the ministerial systems in the mentioned ministries individually under the supervision of the Heiat Aali Jazb and compiling operational features and routine reports.
Keywords
آذر، عادل، خسروانی، فرزانه و سیاهکالی مرادی، جواد (1392). تئوری درام و تحلیل تقابلی: روشی برای ساختاردهی مسئله در مدلسازی سیستمهای پویا. یازدهمین کنفرانس بینالمللی مدیریت، تهران، https://civilica.com/doc/307224
جعفری، عاطفه، کفاشان کاخکی، مجتبی و بهزادی، حسن. (1401). سنجش تأثیر محیط اطلاعاتی و انواع یادگیری اعضای هیأت علمی در توسعه بهره وری گروههای آموزشی حوزه علوم انسانی، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی
خسروانی، فرزانه، آذر، عادل و خداداد حسینی، سید حمید. (1395). ساختاردهی مسئله تدوین استراتژی با استفاده از رویکردهای استراتژی مذاکره و بازتاب مفاهمه و تئوری درام (موردمطالعه: فاز پالایش بعد از تولید زنجیره تأمین سبز گاز). پژوهشهای نوین در تصمیمگیری، 1(1)، 103-138.
ساقی، اکرم، اولیا، محمدصالح و وحدت زاد، محمدعلی. (1396). تحلیل رابطه مدیریت دانش با جذب و نگهداشت هیات علمی توانمند به کمک مدل دینامیکی، اولین کنفرانس ملی انجمن ایرانی پویاشناسی سامانهها، تهران، https://civilica.com/doc/730391
شیخی، کامران، علی نژاد، سودابه و سعیدی نژاد، سیدعلی (1396). بررسی رضایت اعضای هیات علمی از عملکرد کارشناسان مرکز جذب اعضای هیات علمی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری موردمطالعه اعضای هیات علمی شمال غرب کشور، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه مازندران، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی
طهماسبی، رضا، قلی پور، آرین و جواهری زاده، ابراهیم (1391). مدیریت استعدادها: شناسایی و رتبهبندی عوامل مؤثر بر جذب و نگهداشت استعدادهای علمی مدیریت استعدادها: شناسایی و رتبهبندی عوامل مؤثر بر جذب و نگهداشت استعدادهای علمی، پژوهشهای مدیریت عمومی، 17، 5=20.
علی ویسی، ناهید، عدلی، فریبا و وزیری، زیبا (1396). آسیبشناسی سیاستگذاری جذب اعضای هیأت علمی مؤسسات آموزش عالی، پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه الزهرا
محمدی، حسن، نجفی توانا، سعید و آذر، عادل. (1400). واکاوی تقابل در برداشت از میدان مشترک گازی ایران و قطر با رویکرد تئوری درام. پژوهشهای مدیریت در ایران، 20(3)، 25-51.
مصدق، هادی، حسینی، وجیهه سادات (1395). استخراج اقدامات مناسب جذب هیات علمی برای دانشگاههای وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فنآوری: مبتنی بر دیدگاه صاحب نظران جذب. مدیریت سازمان های دولتی، 4(3)، 63-84.
Ali Vaisi, Naheed, Adli, Fariba Voziri, Ziba (2016). The Pathology of Recruitment Policy of Musat Faculty of Higher Education, Master's Thesis, Al-Zahra University[in Persian]
Azar Adel, Khosravani Farzaneh, Jalali Reza.(2012). Drama Theory: A Problem Structuring Method in Soft OR (A Practical Application: Nuclear Negotiations Analysis between Islamic Republic of Iran and the 51 Group). Intl. J. Humanities . Vol. 19(4) https://parsmodir.com/db/research/drama.php
Azar, Adel, Khosravani, Farzaneh and Siahkali Moradi, Javad (2012). Drama theory and contrastive analysis: a method for problem structuring in dynamic systems modeling. The 11th International Management Conference, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/307224[in Persian]
Bennett, P, (1977). Towards a theory of hypergames. Omega, Vol. 5. No. 6, pp. 749– 751.
Bennett, P. (1998).Confrontation analysis as a diagnostic tool. European Journal of Operational Research.Vol. 109.No. 22. pp.465–482.
Bennett, P.G. and Howard, N. Rationality. (1996). Emotion and preference. change drama-theoretic models of choice.European Journal of Operational Research,Vol. 92.No. 3. pp.603–614.
Bennett, P.G.(1980).Hypergames: developing a model of conflict, Futures. Vol. 2.No. 6.pp.489–507.
Bennett, P.G., Bryant, J. and Howard. N. (2001).Drama theory and confrontation analysis, in Rosenhead, J.V. and Mingers, J. (Eds.): Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited,. pp.225–248
Bennett, P.G., Tait, A. and MacDonagh, K. (1994).Interact: developing software for interactive decisions, Group Decision and Negotiation.Vol. 3. No. 4.pp.351– 372.
Boddy, D., Macbeth, D. and Wagner, B. (2000).Implementing collaboration between organizations: an empirical study of supply chain partnering, Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 37. No. 7.pp.1003– 1017.
Bryant, J. (1998). Analyzing collaboration as drama, Systemic Practice and Action Research,.Vol. 11. No. 4. pp.403–417.
Bryant, J. (2002).Confrontations in health service management: insights from drama theory. European Journal of Operational Research.Vol. 142., No. 3. pp.610–624.
Bryant, J.(2010). The role of drama theory in negotiation, Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation: Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation.Vol. 4.No. 2. pp.223–245
Bryant, J., (1997).The plot thickens: understanding interaction through the metaphor of drama, Omega.Vol. 25. No.3.pp. 255-266
Bryant, J.W. and Darwin, J.A.(2004).Exploring inter-organisational European Journal of Operational Research.Vol.151.No. 3. pp.655– 666
Bryant, J.W. and Darwin.J.(2003),Immersive drama: testing health systems, Omega, Vol. 31.No. 2. pp.127–136.
Bryant,J. (2003). TheSix Dilemmas of Collaboration:Inter-organisational Relationships as Drama.Wiley
Bryant,J.(2009).Systemic pathologies of confrontation:diagnosingsecurity disruption, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering. Vol 18. No. 4. pp.423– 436.
Chichester. Bryant, J.(2007).‘Drama theory: dispelling the myths’, Journal of the Operational Research Society. Vol. 58.No. 5. pp.602–613.
Dyer, J.H. and Singh, H.(1988).,The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 23. No. 4. pp.660–679
Fawcett, S.E. and Magnan, G.M.(2002).The rhetoric and reality of supply chain integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. Vol. 32. No. 5. pp.339–361
Hammond, J.H Barilla SpA (A).(1994). Harvard Business School.Case 9-694-46.
Hermawan, P. and Kijima, K.(2009).Conflict analysis of Citarum River Basin pollution in Indonesia: a drama-theoretic model.Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering. Vol. 18. No. 1. pp.16–37
Hermawan, P., Kobayashi, N. and Kijima, K.(2008). Holistic formal analysis of dilemmas of negotiation, Systems Research and Behavioral Science. Vol.25.No. 5.pp.637–642.
Holweg, M., Disney, S., Holmström, J. and Småros, J. (2005).Supply chain collaboration: making sense of the strategy continuum.European Management Journal.Vol. 23.No. 2. pp.170–181.
Howard, N. (1999).Confrontation Analysis: How to Win Operations Other than War.CCRP Publications.Department of Defense.Washington DC.
Howard, N. Bennett, P. Bryant, J. and Bradley, M. .(1992).,Manifesto for a theory of drama and irrational choice. Journal of the Operational Research Society. Vol.44.No. 1. pp.99–103
Howard, N.(1990).Soft game theory, Information and Decision Technologies, 16(3), .pp.215–227.
Howard, N.(1998).Paradoxes of Rationality: Games, Metagames, and Political Behavior.MIT Press. Cambridge. MA.pp. 248.
Howard, N., (1994).Drama theory and its relationship to Game theory, Parts 1 and 2, Group Decision and Negotiation. Vol. 3.No 2. pp.187– 206.207–235.
Howard, N., (1996). Negotiation as drama: how games become dramatic, International Negotiation. Vol. 1. No. 1. pp.125–152.
Howard, N.,N-person.(1998). soft games, Journal of Operational Research Society.Vol. 49.No. 2. pp.144–150
Jafari, Atefeh, Kafashan Kakhki, Mojtabi and Behzadi, Hasan's assessment of the information environment and the types of faculty members in the development of the productivity of educational groups in the field of humanities, Master's thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology. [in Persian]
Jiang, H.Vidal, J.M. and Huhns, M.N.(2006).Incorporating emotions into automated negotiation.Proceedings ofAgent Construction and Emotions. Workshop. Austria.
Khosravani, Farzaneh, Azar, Adel and Khodadad Hosseini, Seyyed Hamid. (2015). Planning strategizing using the methods of reasoning and reflection, understanding and drama theory (case study: refining phase after the production of multi-green gas). New Researches in Decision Making, 1(1), 103-138.[in Persian]
Lambert, D.M. and Knemeyer, A.M.(2004).We’re in this together.Harvard Business Review.Vol. 82No. 12. pp.114–122.
Lambert, D.M., Emmelhainz, M.A. and Gardner, J.T., (1996).Developing. and implementing supply chain partnerships. The International Journal of Logistics Management.Vol. 7.No. 2. pp.1–17
Lambert, D.M., Knemeyer, A.M. and Gardner, J.T.(2004).Supply chain partnerships: model validation and implementation.Journal of Business Logistics. Vol. 25.No.2. pp.21–42.
Lawler, E.J. and Thye, S.R., (1999).Bringing emotions into social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology.Vol. 25.pp.217–244.
Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang, S. (1997).The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Review. Vol. 38.No. 3. pp.93–102.
Levy, J.K. and Howard, N. (2009).Advances in sustainable security systems engineering with Drama Theory (DT) II. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering.Vol. 18.No. 4.pp.403–422.
Mohammadi, Hassan, Najafi Tawana, Saeed and Azar, Adel. (1400). Analyzing the contrast in the perception of the common gas field of Iran and Qatar with the possibilities of drama theory. Management Research in Iran, 20(3), 25-51. [in Persian]
Mossadegh, Hadi, Hosseini, Vajiya Sadat (2015). The right choice for faculty recruitment for the universities of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology: Based on the opinion of the recruitment experts, 4(3), 63-84.[in persian]
Obeidi, A. and Hipel, K.W.Strategic and dilemma analyses of a water export conflict. INFOR.Vol. 43. No. 3. pp.247–270.
Saqi, Akram, Olya, Mohammad Saleh and Hohdatzad, Mohammad Ali (2016). Analysis of the relationship between knowledge management and the attraction and retention of competent faculty using the dynamic model, the first national conference of the Iranian Society of System Dynamics, Tehran, https://civilica.com/ doc/730391[in Persian]
Sheikhi, Kamran, Alinejad, Sudabah and Saidinejad, Seyed Ali (2016). Member review Faculty from the actions of the center for attracting faculty members of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (case study of faculty members in the northwest of the country, master's thesis, Mazandaran University, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences[in Persian]
Simatupang, T.M. and Sridharan, R., (2005).An integrative framework for supply chain collaboration. The International Journal of Logistics Management. Vol.16.No. 2. pp.257–274.
Simchi-Levi, D. Kaminsky, P. and Simchi-Levi, E..(2007). Designing and Managing. the Supply Chain.3rd ed. McGraw-Hill Irwin. New York
Tahmasabi, Reza, Qolipour, Arin and Javaherizadeh, Ibrahim (2011). Talent management: identification and ranking of factors affecting the attraction and retention of scientific talents. Talent management: identification and ranking of the factors of attraction and retention of scientific talents.17, 5-20. [in Persian]
Tait, A. and Richardson, K.A. (2008).Confronting complexity, Emergence: Complexity and Organization. Vol. 10.No. 2.pp.27–40.
Togar Simatupang, Ramaswami Sridhara.(2011). A drama theory analysis of supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Collaborative Enterprise2.129-146
Yuanita Handayati, Togar Simatupang, Ramaswami Sridharan.(2011). An analysis of collaboration between Coca-Cola and Carrefour using drama theory. International Journal of Value Chain Management 5(1). 1-24
)